By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
P9O Newsletter
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our investigative stories, breaking news, podcasts etc..

Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
  • Home
  • Nigeria
  • Politics
  • Metro
  • World
  • Lifestyle
  • Football
  • 2027 elections
Reading: Court dismisses suit seeking IGP’s sack
Prime 9ja Online
Prime 9ja Online Prime 9ja Online
Aa
  • Africa
  • Business
  • Football
  • Metro
  • Nigeria
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Technology
Search
  • Categories
  • _Football
  • _Lifestyle
  • _World
  • _Metro
  • _Politics
  • _Nigeria
  • Pages
  • _About Us
  • _Contact Us
  • _Privacy Policy
Follow Us
Nigeria

Court dismisses suit seeking IGP’s sack

Tuesday, Justice John Omotsho of the Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed a lawsuit filed by social crusader Michael Idoko seeking the remo...

Chima Joseph Ugo
Chima Joseph Ugo - Editor-in-chief February 22, 2023
Updated February 22, 2023 at 10:48 AM
Share
Court dismisses suit seeking IGP’s sack
SHARE

Court dismisses suit seeking IGP’s sack

Tuesday, Justice John Omotsho of the Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed a lawsuit filed by social crusader Michael Idoko seeking the removal of Inspector-General of Police Alkali Usman Baba.

Idoko, the plaintiff in the case with reference number FHC/CS/31/2023, specifically requested that the court declare Alkali Usman Baba's appointment as illegal and null and void, as well as remove him as the Inspector-General of Police.

The plaintiff also asked the court to declare that the IGP is required by law to retire after 35 years of service or at the age of 60, whichever comes first.

However, Justice Omotosho, in his ruling, stated that the first, second, and third defendants had submitted preliminary objections asking the court to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction, abuse of court process, and the plaintiff's lack of the right to file the lawsuit.

The court further held that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate that the appointment of the IGP on November 30, 2021, for a four-year term violated his fundamental rights or that he was disregarded in favour of the second defendant.

Additionally, the court concluded that the plaintiff was not a police officer and had not demonstrated that he had suffered significant losses as a result of the IGP's appointment.

“The suit is speculative, academic and hypothetical.

“Plaintiff is neither the Attorney-General of the Fed­eration nor Attorney-Gener­al of a state that files funda­mental rights suits on behalf of the public.

“The suit is bound to be dismissed for lack of lo­cus,” the court held.

But the court said, “Assuming, but not conceding, that the plaintiff has the legal right to file the suit,” and the judge pointed out that, according to section 7(6) of the Police Act of 2020, an IGP must be a serving police officer, which the second defendant is.

“Second defendant is en­titled to enjoy his four-year tenure as Inspector-Gener­al of Police, not minding his age.”

The judge ruled that Alkali Baba Usman’s retirement from the Nigeria Police Force has nothing to do with his appointment because an IGP’s four-year term is set in stone.

Tags: Nigeria

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share this Article
Facebook WhatsApp TwitterEmail Print

You Might Also Like

Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Pinterest Pin
Telegram Subscribe
Prime 9ja Online

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our latest updates instantly on your email.

About

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclaimer
  • Fact-Checking Policy
  • Code of Ethics
  • Corrections and Correctives
  • Editorial Integrity
  • Ethical Conduct
  • Funding

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Submit a Tip

© 2026 Prime 9ja Online Media - All Rights Reserved.

Follow Us