Counsel for the petitioners, J.S Okutepa, expressed their frustrations, stating that they had repeatedly requested the documents from INEC through pleas, letters, and persuasion, but all their efforts were in vain. They decided to bring the matter to the attention of the court in the hopes of finding a resolution.
However, A.B. Mahmoud, the lead counsel for INEC, expressed surprise at Okutepa's reaction, as he had previously assured the petitioners' lead counsel, Livy Uzoukwu, of their willingness to cooperate. Mahmoud insisted that any delay in releasing the documents would be a result of counsels not following due process, and therefore, INEC should not be solely blamed.
Uzoukwu then informed the court that he had not received any response to the letters he had sent to INEC regarding the documents. This delay has caused them difficulties in presenting the necessary evidence and calling their witnesses.
The tribunal cautioned the counsels of the Labour Party (LP) and INEC, urging them to cooperate more and avoid wasting the court's time with lamentations. The court also warned against sentiments and blackmail, emphasising the importance of prioritising the interest and integrity of Nigeria.
Wole Olanipekun, the lead counsel to Bola Ahmed Tinubu, pleaded with INEC and LP to calm down and work together, recognising that accusations and counter-accusations will not lead to a resolution of the matter.
Consequently, Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani adjourned the petition for the continuation of the hearing until June 20. The court expects both parties to use this time to address the document issue and ensure a smoother process moving forward.